<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1581 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380853</link>
    <description>The appellant filed a miscellaneous application seeking rectification of a mistake in the final order, specifically in para 7.3. The appellant argued for rectification due to an error in the final order. The Tribunal accepted the rectification, modifying the last sentence of para 7.3 to correct the error. The rectification was allowed in the interest of justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 May 2019 09:56:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1581 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380853</link>
      <description>The appellant filed a miscellaneous application seeking rectification of a mistake in the final order, specifically in para 7.3. The appellant argued for rectification due to an error in the final order. The Tribunal accepted the rectification, modifying the last sentence of para 7.3 to correct the error. The rectification was allowed in the interest of justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>