<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1576 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380848</link>
    <description>The case involved a dispute over the denial of a refund of duties claimed to be paid in excess due to the disallowance of a specific customs notification benefit. The appellant, a company, imported machinery, re-exported and re-imported it with a claim for the notification benefit. The authorities initially denied the refund based on alleged impermissible MODVAT credit availment. However, the Tribunal found the appellant eligible for the exemption under the notification as no conditions related to MODVAT were specified. The court set aside the order disallowing the refund, emphasizing strict adherence to statutory provisions and exemption notifications without imposing unauthorized conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2020 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1576 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380848</link>
      <description>The case involved a dispute over the denial of a refund of duties claimed to be paid in excess due to the disallowance of a specific customs notification benefit. The appellant, a company, imported machinery, re-exported and re-imported it with a claim for the notification benefit. The authorities initially denied the refund based on alleged impermissible MODVAT credit availment. However, the Tribunal found the appellant eligible for the exemption under the notification as no conditions related to MODVAT were specified. The court set aside the order disallowing the refund, emphasizing strict adherence to statutory provisions and exemption notifications without imposing unauthorized conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>