<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1572 - ATPMLA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380844</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the prosecution complaint against the deceased individual was null and void, and property attachment proceedings could not continue post-death. Procedural requirements under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act were not met, leading to the retention of seized property being declared null and void. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 May 2019 09:52:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1572 - ATPMLA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380844</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the prosecution complaint against the deceased individual was null and void, and property attachment proceedings could not continue post-death. Procedural requirements under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act were not met, leading to the retention of seized property being declared null and void. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>