https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380843 The court upheld the penalties imposed on the appellant for non-payment of service tax despite collecting it from clients. The appellant's failure to remit the collected service tax was considered fraudulent, not a result of a genuine belief, leading to the rejection of the appeal. The judgment, dated 24 May 2019, affirmed the penalties under Section 78 of the Act and Sections 77(1)(a) and 77(2) of the Act. en-us Fri, 24 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 May 2019 09:51:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380843 The court upheld the penalties imposed on the appellant for non-payment of service tax despite collecting it from clients. The appellant's failure to remit the collected service tax was considered fraudulent, not a result of a genuine belief, leading to the rejection of the appeal. The judgment, dated 24 May 2019, affirmed the penalties under Section 78 of the Act and Sections 77(1)(a) and 77(2) of the Act. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 24 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380843