<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1618 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280996</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the penalty of Rs. 59,000 imposed on a home appliances dealer for transporting goods without declaration at an enroute check post, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty. The Court emphasized that non-declaration raises a presumption of evasion, especially with significant delays in transport. It criticized the Tribunal for deviating from established court decisions and reinstated the penalty to maintain consistency in tax enforcement and prevent preferential treatment based on the assessee&#039;s stature. The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and restored that of the first appellate authority without imposing costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 May 2019 09:38:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1618 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280996</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the penalty of Rs. 59,000 imposed on a home appliances dealer for transporting goods without declaration at an enroute check post, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty. The Court emphasized that non-declaration raises a presumption of evasion, especially with significant delays in transport. It criticized the Tribunal for deviating from established court decisions and reinstated the penalty to maintain consistency in tax enforcement and prevent preferential treatment based on the assessee&#039;s stature. The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and restored that of the first appellate authority without imposing costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>