https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280984 Part payment extended limitation under the Indian Limitation Act only where a written acknowledgment signed by the payer existed before the suit was instituted; a later or absent acknowledgment could not revive a time-barred money claim, so the personal decree was barred. The mortgage bond also failed on the evidence because attestation was not proved to be legally proper, given the discrepancy between writing, execution, and registration. The bond was therefore not enforceable as a valid mortgage, and the claim failed both as a personal suit and as a mortgage suit. en-us Wed, 17 Oct 1951 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 May 2019 18:05:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280984 Part payment extended limitation under the Indian Limitation Act only where a written acknowledgment signed by the payer existed before the suit was instituted; a later or absent acknowledgment could not revive a time-barred money claim, so the personal decree was barred. The mortgage bond also failed on the evidence because attestation was not proved to be legally proper, given the discrepancy between writing, execution, and registration. The bond was therefore not enforceable as a valid mortgage, and the claim failed both as a personal suit and as a mortgage suit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Oct 1951 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280984