https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18311 Where the Tribunal's findings on the genuineness and quantum of a secret commission deduction were challenged as perverse and based on irrelevant considerations, an arguable question of law was held to arise under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Revenue had pointed to defects, irregularities and lacunae in the vouchers and supporting material, and the Court found that these contentions made the issue debatable on the evidence. A referable question of law was therefore identified, and the reference application was allowed with the question recast for opinion. en-us Wed, 01 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:29:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18311 Where the Tribunal's findings on the genuineness and quantum of a secret commission deduction were challenged as perverse and based on irrelevant considerations, an arguable question of law was held to arise under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Revenue had pointed to defects, irregularities and lacunae in the vouchers and supporting material, and the Court found that these contentions made the issue debatable on the evidence. A referable question of law was therefore identified, and the reference application was allowed with the question recast for opinion. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 01 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18311