<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1550 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380822</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the issues back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration in all three assessment years, as the CIT(A) failed to adjudicate the merits of the additions made by the Assessing Officer. The appeals of the assessee were partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 15:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1550 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380822</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the issues back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration in all three assessment years, as the CIT(A) failed to adjudicate the merits of the additions made by the Assessing Officer. The appeals of the assessee were partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>