<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1547 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380819</link>
    <description>The tribunal quashed the revisionary order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. It held that the limited scrutiny could not be expanded without proper approval, and the assessment order was not erroneous on grounds beyond the limited scrutiny. Additionally, it was noted that the agreement value was consistent with the rate used to determine on-money, and a previous decision supported the assessee&#039;s position. As a result, the tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling in their favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1547 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380819</link>
      <description>The tribunal quashed the revisionary order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. It held that the limited scrutiny could not be expanded without proper approval, and the assessment order was not erroneous on grounds beyond the limited scrutiny. Additionally, it was noted that the agreement value was consistent with the rate used to determine on-money, and a previous decision supported the assessee&#039;s position. As a result, the tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling in their favor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>