https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280963 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the denial of Cenvat credit for substandard goods was unjustified under the Cenvat statute. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of commercial practices and agreements, concluding that the appellant should not be denied the Cenvat credit. Additionally, the Tribunal interpreted Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules to support the appellant's position, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant. en-us Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 May 2019 06:54:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280963 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the denial of Cenvat credit for substandard goods was unjustified under the Cenvat statute. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of commercial practices and agreements, concluding that the appellant should not be denied the Cenvat credit. Additionally, the Tribunal interpreted Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules to support the appellant's position, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280963