<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 112 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18302</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that precious stones disclosed under the Voluntary Disclosure Scheme, 1975, did not qualify as capital assets for capital gain tax purposes under section 2(14)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee&#039;s contribution of stones towards capital in a firm was deemed not to trigger capital gain tax liability, as there was no transfer of capital assets within the meaning of section 45. The exclusion under section 2(14)(i) applied, reflecting the assessee&#039;s history as a dealer in precious stones and the genuine intention to contribute the stones as capital, aligning with relevant precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:13:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 112 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18302</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that precious stones disclosed under the Voluntary Disclosure Scheme, 1975, did not qualify as capital assets for capital gain tax purposes under section 2(14)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee&#039;s contribution of stones towards capital in a firm was deemed not to trigger capital gain tax liability, as there was no transfer of capital assets within the meaning of section 45. The exclusion under section 2(14)(i) applied, reflecting the assessee&#039;s history as a dealer in precious stones and the genuine intention to contribute the stones as capital, aligning with relevant precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>