<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1646 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280976</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 20,79,000 as unexplained cash deposits in the bank account under section 69 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found the explanation provided by the assessee implausible based on the analysis of cash flow and inconsistent deposit patterns. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 May 2019 06:54:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1646 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280976</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 20,79,000 as unexplained cash deposits in the bank account under section 69 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found the explanation provided by the assessee implausible based on the analysis of cash flow and inconsistent deposit patterns. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>