<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (5) TMI 66 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18297</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming the validity of the partnership deed and the interpretation that the minor partner was admitted to the benefits of the firm without liability for losses. The Court also upheld the accuracy of Form No. 11 for registration purposes, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments and emphasizing the importance of accurate documentation in partnership registrations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:03:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (5) TMI 66 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18297</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming the validity of the partnership deed and the interpretation that the minor partner was admitted to the benefits of the firm without liability for losses. The Court also upheld the accuracy of Form No. 11 for registration purposes, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments and emphasizing the importance of accurate documentation in partnership registrations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>