<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 815 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280957</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitions under Section 9 and Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act due to lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, which involved immovable property situated in Amritsar. The court vacated the interim order dated 03.7.2009.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 17:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 815 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280957</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitions under Section 9 and Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act due to lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, which involved immovable property situated in Amritsar. The court vacated the interim order dated 03.7.2009.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>