<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1500 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380772</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding the penalty order under section 158BFA(2) of the Income Tax Act to be barred by limitation and subsequently quashed it. The Tribunal found that the penalty order was passed beyond the prescribed time limit as per section 158BFA(3)(c), following a judicial precedent that such orders are time-barred. Consequently, the Tribunal did not assess the merits of the case, invalidating the penalty order solely on the grounds of being time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 08:08:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1500 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380772</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding the penalty order under section 158BFA(2) of the Income Tax Act to be barred by limitation and subsequently quashed it. The Tribunal found that the penalty order was passed beyond the prescribed time limit as per section 158BFA(3)(c), following a judicial precedent that such orders are time-barred. Consequently, the Tribunal did not assess the merits of the case, invalidating the penalty order solely on the grounds of being time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>