https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380766 The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) rejected the appeal against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) striking off the company's name by the Registrar of Companies (ROC). Despite the appellant's claims and arguments regarding business operations and notice service, NCLAT found insufficient evidence to prove the company was carrying on business or in operation when its name was struck off. Based on the analysis of documents and financial statements, NCLAT affirmed the decision that there was no justification to restore the company's name on the register. en-us Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 May 2019 08:08:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380766 The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) rejected the appeal against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) striking off the company's name by the Registrar of Companies (ROC). Despite the appellant's claims and arguments regarding business operations and notice service, NCLAT found insufficient evidence to prove the company was carrying on business or in operation when its name was struck off. Based on the analysis of documents and financial statements, NCLAT affirmed the decision that there was no justification to restore the company's name on the register. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380766