https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380761 The Tribunal held that the extended period for demand was not applicable in the case involving service tax recovery from a professional cricket player. Consequently, the tax liability was discharged, and no penalty was imposed. The Tribunal also found the service tax liability on the player unsustainable, citing precedents involving similar cases. As a result, the revenue's appeal was rejected, affirming the discharge of tax liability and concluding the legal dispute in favor of the appellant. en-us Tue, 21 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 May 2019 08:07:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380761 The Tribunal held that the extended period for demand was not applicable in the case involving service tax recovery from a professional cricket player. Consequently, the tax liability was discharged, and no penalty was imposed. The Tribunal also found the service tax liability on the player unsustainable, citing precedents involving similar cases. As a result, the revenue's appeal was rejected, affirming the discharge of tax liability and concluding the legal dispute in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 21 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380761