<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1487 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380759</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with consequential relief. The decision emphasized the significance of the revenue proving allegations of non-payment of Service Tax, particularly when discrepancies exist between financial records and tax returns without concrete evidence of tax evasion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 14:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572909" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1487 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380759</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with consequential relief. The decision emphasized the significance of the revenue proving allegations of non-payment of Service Tax, particularly when discrepancies exist between financial records and tax returns without concrete evidence of tax evasion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>