<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1485 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380757</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, allowing the appeals with consequential relief. It ruled that joint property owners should not be considered an association of persons (AOP) for service tax purposes, and their rental income should be assessed individually. The exemption under Notification No. 06/05-ST applies to individual co-owners if their rental income is below the threshold limit. The Tribunal emphasized the need for individual assessment of tax liability, referencing relevant judgments to support its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 17:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1485 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380757</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, allowing the appeals with consequential relief. It ruled that joint property owners should not be considered an association of persons (AOP) for service tax purposes, and their rental income should be assessed individually. The exemption under Notification No. 06/05-ST applies to individual co-owners if their rental income is below the threshold limit. The Tribunal emphasized the need for individual assessment of tax liability, referencing relevant judgments to support its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>