https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380751 The Tribunal held that Rule 11(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was not applicable as the appellant continued to produce dutiable products. It clarified that Cenvat credit on goods in-process and stock would be admissible only for inputs used in dutiable final products. The Tribunal set aside the Original Authority's order, directing a re-quantification of demand and penalties, emphasizing compliance with natural justice principles. Additionally, it ruled in favor of the appellant regarding eligibility of Cenvat credit on returned goods under Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded for further adjudication. en-us Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 May 2019 08:07:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380751 The Tribunal held that Rule 11(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was not applicable as the appellant continued to produce dutiable products. It clarified that Cenvat credit on goods in-process and stock would be admissible only for inputs used in dutiable final products. The Tribunal set aside the Original Authority's order, directing a re-quantification of demand and penalties, emphasizing compliance with natural justice principles. Additionally, it ruled in favor of the appellant regarding eligibility of Cenvat credit on returned goods under Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded for further adjudication. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380751