<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant Challenges Rejection of Declared Value for Imported Goods Citing Non-Compliance with Rule 14 Provisions.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46821</link>
    <description>Valuation of imported goods - rejected of declared value - the appellant has accepted the enhanced value and paid the differential duty, but only for the reasons that the consignment was incurring a heavy demurrage and detention charge by the custodian - Since provision of rule 14 not complied with, value cannot be rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 07:59:15 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 07:59:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant Challenges Rejection of Declared Value for Imported Goods Citing Non-Compliance with Rule 14 Provisions.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46821</link>
      <description>Valuation of imported goods - rejected of declared value - the appellant has accepted the enhanced value and paid the differential duty, but only for the reasons that the consignment was incurring a heavy demurrage and detention charge by the custodian - Since provision of rule 14 not complied with, value cannot be rejected.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 07:59:15 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>