<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1472 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380744</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, finding that the adjudicating authority and the Commissioner (Appeals) failed to follow the Customs Valuation Rules sequentially. The Tribunal allowed the appeal with consequential benefits, emphasizing the need for proper application of valuation rules and recognizing the appellant&#039;s acceptance of enhanced value under duress.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 07:59:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1472 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380744</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, finding that the adjudicating authority and the Commissioner (Appeals) failed to follow the Customs Valuation Rules sequentially. The Tribunal allowed the appeal with consequential benefits, emphasizing the need for proper application of valuation rules and recognizing the appellant&#039;s acceptance of enhanced value under duress.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>