<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1468 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380740</link>
    <description>The court held that the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, operates concurrently with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, without one act overriding the other. Individuals involved in money laundering offenses cannot seek protection under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Resolution Professional could not benefit from Section 14 as the attachments were made before the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 07:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1468 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380740</link>
      <description>The court held that the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, operates concurrently with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, without one act overriding the other. Individuals involved in money laundering offenses cannot seek protection under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Resolution Professional could not benefit from Section 14 as the attachments were made before the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>