https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380739 Proceedings to quash the orders requiring the petitioner to face trial under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act were declined at the pre-trial stage because evidence had already been partly recorded and the remaining evidence was still pending. The Court held that the legality of the impugned orders and the asserted circular could not be tested before the trial concluded, especially since the circular's existence and applicability were still unestablished. The petitioner was permitted to raise the same pleas before the trial court at final arguments, and the challenge was not decided on merits. en-us Wed, 15 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 May 2019 07:45:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380739 Proceedings to quash the orders requiring the petitioner to face trial under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act were declined at the pre-trial stage because evidence had already been partly recorded and the remaining evidence was still pending. The Court held that the legality of the impugned orders and the asserted circular could not be tested before the trial concluded, especially since the circular's existence and applicability were still unestablished. The petitioner was permitted to raise the same pleas before the trial court at final arguments, and the challenge was not decided on merits. Case-Laws FEMA Wed, 15 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380739