https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380736 The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order dated September 5, 2017, was set aside. The documents retained by the Enforcement Directorate were to be handed over to the appellant, who was entitled to receive copies under Section 21 of the PMLA. The judgment emphasized the significance of complying with procedural requirements and highlighted that the retention order lapsed due to the non-filing of a prosecution complaint within the prescribed period. en-us Thu, 23 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 May 2019 07:43:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380736 The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order dated September 5, 2017, was set aside. The documents retained by the Enforcement Directorate were to be handed over to the appellant, who was entitled to receive copies under Section 21 of the PMLA. The judgment emphasized the significance of complying with procedural requirements and highlighted that the retention order lapsed due to the non-filing of a prosecution complaint within the prescribed period. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 23 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380736