<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1461 - ATPMLA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380733</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, highlighting the mandatory provisions of the PMLA and the ED&#039;s failure to comply with procedural requirements. The Tribunal ordered the return of seized properties to the appellant, with the ED permitted to retain photocopies of records and digital evidence if needed, without expressing an opinion on their potential future reliance in Special Court proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 07:40:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1461 - ATPMLA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380733</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, highlighting the mandatory provisions of the PMLA and the ED&#039;s failure to comply with procedural requirements. The Tribunal ordered the return of seized properties to the appellant, with the ED permitted to retain photocopies of records and digital evidence if needed, without expressing an opinion on their potential future reliance in Special Court proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>