<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1458 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380730</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the extended period of limitation could not be invoked as there was no deliberate suppression with intent to evade payment of duty alleged in the show cause notice. As a result, the order passed by the Commissioner of Service Tax was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 07:38:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1458 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380730</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the extended period of limitation could not be invoked as there was no deliberate suppression with intent to evade payment of duty alleged in the show cause notice. As a result, the order passed by the Commissioner of Service Tax was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>