<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Delhi VAT Can&#039;t Enforce Haryana&#039;s Retrospective C Form Cancellation Due to Lack of Authority.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46814</link>
    <description>Rejection of C-Forms - Territorial Jurisdiction - The argument for the Delhi VAT authorities that the Haryana authorities had the power or somehow could retrospectively cancel the C Forms, is rejected. If it is stated that no power exists to cancel a C Form retrospectively, no authority at least in Delhi can give effect to such order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 07:27:46 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 07:27:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Delhi VAT Can&#039;t Enforce Haryana&#039;s Retrospective C Form Cancellation Due to Lack of Authority.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46814</link>
      <description>Rejection of C-Forms - Territorial Jurisdiction - The argument for the Delhi VAT authorities that the Haryana authorities had the power or somehow could retrospectively cancel the C Forms, is rejected. If it is stated that no power exists to cancel a C Form retrospectively, no authority at least in Delhi can give effect to such order.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 07:27:46 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>