<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1479 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280939</link>
    <description>The High Court declined to grant a similar order as requested by the petitioner based on a Division Bench&#039;s decision, emphasizing the distinction in powers between the High Court and the Supreme Court, which had stayed the judgment in question. Despite the Supreme Court&#039;s stay, the goods were directed to be released within a week. The Court scheduled further proceedings, indicating a need for additional considerations or developments in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2019 17:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1479 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280939</link>
      <description>The High Court declined to grant a similar order as requested by the petitioner based on a Division Bench&#039;s decision, emphasizing the distinction in powers between the High Court and the Supreme Court, which had stayed the judgment in question. Despite the Supreme Court&#039;s stay, the goods were directed to be released within a week. The Court scheduled further proceedings, indicating a need for additional considerations or developments in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>