https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280937 The appeal against the striking off of the Company's name under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 was dismissed by the Tribunal. Despite the Company's arguments regarding procedural irregularities and evidence of its operations during the striking off period, the Tribunal found insufficient proof of the Company being in operation. Consequently, the Tribunal concluded that the Company did not meet the conditions for restoration under Section 252 and, therefore, declined to restore its name on the Register of Companies. The appeal was dismissed without costs awarded to the Company. en-us Mon, 23 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 May 2019 07:27:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280937 The appeal against the striking off of the Company's name under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 was dismissed by the Tribunal. Despite the Company's arguments regarding procedural irregularities and evidence of its operations during the striking off period, the Tribunal found insufficient proof of the Company being in operation. Consequently, the Tribunal concluded that the Company did not meet the conditions for restoration under Section 252 and, therefore, declined to restore its name on the Register of Companies. The appeal was dismissed without costs awarded to the Company. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 23 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280937