<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1615 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280941</link>
    <description>Writ petitions challenging assessment orders under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 were not maintainable because the disputes involved mixed questions of fact and law better examined on appeal. The statutory appellate remedy was treated as efficacious, and the petitioner could not bypass that remedy by invoking writ jurisdiction at the threshold. The petitions were therefore dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 07:27:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1615 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280941</link>
      <description>Writ petitions challenging assessment orders under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 were not maintainable because the disputes involved mixed questions of fact and law better examined on appeal. The statutory appellate remedy was treated as efficacious, and the petitioner could not bypass that remedy by invoking writ jurisdiction at the threshold. The petitions were therefore dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>