<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>DOCTRINE OF ‘BIAS’</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8515</link>
    <description>Doctrine of bias, a core limb of natural justice under nemo judex in causa sua, asks whether a reasonable, fully informed observer would apprehend that a decision-maker is predisposed to favour a party; mere suspicion or subjective conjecture is inadequate. The test focuses on external appearance and reasonable apprehension stemming from pecuniary, personal, official or relational interests, and requires contextual, evidence-based appraisal rather than inquiry into actual mental prejudice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 07:22:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 07:22:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>DOCTRINE OF ‘BIAS’</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8515</link>
      <description>Doctrine of bias, a core limb of natural justice under nemo judex in causa sua, asks whether a reasonable, fully informed observer would apprehend that a decision-maker is predisposed to favour a party; mere suspicion or subjective conjecture is inadequate. The test focuses on external appearance and reasonable apprehension stemming from pecuniary, personal, official or relational interests, and requires contextual, evidence-based appraisal rather than inquiry into actual mental prejudice.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Other Topics</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 07:22:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>