<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 72 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18283</link>
    <description>Where an assessee funded the purchase of an estate in the name of a minor child, without the child having an independent source of income or adequate consideration, section 9(2) of the Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950 applied to club the income from the asset in the assessee&#039;s assessment. The concurrent factual findings that the assessee was the real source of consideration were decisive, and the income was held includible in the assessee&#039;s agricultural income. The Tribunal was also justified in preferring the registered sale deed over a contrary certificate, because the deed and surrounding evidence consistently supported the Revenue&#039;s version.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:32:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 72 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18283</link>
      <description>Where an assessee funded the purchase of an estate in the name of a minor child, without the child having an independent source of income or adequate consideration, section 9(2) of the Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950 applied to club the income from the asset in the assessee&#039;s assessment. The concurrent factual findings that the assessee was the real source of consideration were decisive, and the income was held includible in the assessee&#039;s agricultural income. The Tribunal was also justified in preferring the registered sale deed over a contrary certificate, because the deed and surrounding evidence consistently supported the Revenue&#039;s version.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>