<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (10) TMI 291 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280928</link>
    <description>An arbitration clause referring to a Superintending Engineer of the State Public Works Department was construed by its ordinary meaning to include the Irrigation wing, and the officer&#039;s departmental connection did not invalidate the appointment merely because he served under the Chief Engineer. Section 41A of the Arbitration (Orissa Amendment) Act, 1982, with its non-obstante clause, required disputes involving the State or a controlled authority, including pending references without an award, to be transferred to the statutory Arbitration Tribunal. The earlier orders were set aside and the dispute directed to proceed before the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 14:32:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (10) TMI 291 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280928</link>
      <description>An arbitration clause referring to a Superintending Engineer of the State Public Works Department was construed by its ordinary meaning to include the Irrigation wing, and the officer&#039;s departmental connection did not invalidate the appointment merely because he served under the Chief Engineer. Section 41A of the Arbitration (Orissa Amendment) Act, 1982, with its non-obstante clause, required disputes involving the State or a controlled authority, including pending references without an award, to be transferred to the statutory Arbitration Tribunal. The earlier orders were set aside and the dispute directed to proceed before the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>