<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1429 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380701</link>
    <description>Potato flakes were held classifiable under Chapter 20 of the Central Excise Tariff Act because an earlier Tribunal order in the same assessee&#039;s case had already accepted that classification, and no stay of that order was shown. The Tribunal followed its prior decision and found no basis to depart from it, so the appellate classification under Chapter 20 was sustained and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 18:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1429 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380701</link>
      <description>Potato flakes were held classifiable under Chapter 20 of the Central Excise Tariff Act because an earlier Tribunal order in the same assessee&#039;s case had already accepted that classification, and no stay of that order was shown. The Tribunal followed its prior decision and found no basis to depart from it, so the appellate classification under Chapter 20 was sustained and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>