<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1404 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380676</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting the refund of accumulated cenvat credit. The Tribunal found that the factory had ceased production activities, evidenced by nil returns and certification of closure. The sale of machinery and capital goods further supported the closure of the factory, making the appellant eligible for the refund. The decision emphasized the significance of factual evidence and legal precedents in determining eligibility for refund claims in cases of factory closure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 06:58:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1404 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380676</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting the refund of accumulated cenvat credit. The Tribunal found that the factory had ceased production activities, evidenced by nil returns and certification of closure. The sale of machinery and capital goods further supported the closure of the factory, making the appellant eligible for the refund. The decision emphasized the significance of factual evidence and legal precedents in determining eligibility for refund claims in cases of factory closure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>