<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1264 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280924</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, stating no disallowance can be made if no exempt income is earned. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the adjustment to interest income based on the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s order, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal. Furthermore, the Tribunal decided in favor of the assessee concerning the guarantee fee adjustment, stating that providing a corporate guarantee does not constitute an international transaction. The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals related to the guarantee fee adjustment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 06:51:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1264 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280924</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, stating no disallowance can be made if no exempt income is earned. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the adjustment to interest income based on the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s order, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal. Furthermore, the Tribunal decided in favor of the assessee concerning the guarantee fee adjustment, stating that providing a corporate guarantee does not constitute an international transaction. The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals related to the guarantee fee adjustment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>