<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 65 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18271</link>
    <description>The court held that the Tribunal&#039;s rejection of the petitioner&#039;s petitions without allowing presentation of the case and without reasons violated natural justice. The court quashed the order and directed the Tribunal to consider the petitions to set aside the ex parte order, ensuring a fair process and opportunity to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:40:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 65 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18271</link>
      <description>The court held that the Tribunal&#039;s rejection of the petitioner&#039;s petitions without allowing presentation of the case and without reasons violated natural justice. The court quashed the order and directed the Tribunal to consider the petitions to set aside the ex parte order, ensuring a fair process and opportunity to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>