<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 1159 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280917</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the penalty order was time-barred under section 158BFA(3)(c) of the IT Act. Consequently, the penalty imposed on the assessee was deemed invalid, and the appeal was allowed. The Tribunal did not address the merits of the penalty since it found the penalty order to be time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2019 10:07:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 1159 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280917</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the penalty order was time-barred under section 158BFA(3)(c) of the IT Act. Consequently, the penalty imposed on the assessee was deemed invalid, and the appeal was allowed. The Tribunal did not address the merits of the penalty since it found the penalty order to be time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>