<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1391 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380663</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the turnover for Section 80HHC deduction must encompass all business units, not just export units. Additionally, the court affirmed that expenditure under Section 35(I)(ii) should be deducted before computing Section 80HHC deduction. The appeals by the assessee were dismissed, with the court emphasizing adherence to statutory provisions and previous Supreme Court rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 15:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1391 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380663</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the turnover for Section 80HHC deduction must encompass all business units, not just export units. Additionally, the court affirmed that expenditure under Section 35(I)(ii) should be deducted before computing Section 80HHC deduction. The appeals by the assessee were dismissed, with the court emphasizing adherence to statutory provisions and previous Supreme Court rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>