<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1382 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380654</link>
    <description>The ITAT set aside penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) for additional income declared during assessment proceedings after filing the return under section 153A. The ITAT found that penalties for both concealing income and furnishing inaccurate particulars simultaneously were impermissible under the law. Relying on legal precedents, the ITAT directed the deletion of penalties, ruling in favor of the assessee in all three appeals for assessment years 2005-06, 2006-07, and 2007-08.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2019 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1382 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380654</link>
      <description>The ITAT set aside penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) for additional income declared during assessment proceedings after filing the return under section 153A. The ITAT found that penalties for both concealing income and furnishing inaccurate particulars simultaneously were impermissible under the law. Relying on legal precedents, the ITAT directed the deletion of penalties, ruling in favor of the assessee in all three appeals for assessment years 2005-06, 2006-07, and 2007-08.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>