<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1358 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380630</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in a case involving the valuation of imported interlining fabric. It dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, ruling that reliance on NIDB data alone was insufficient to enhance the declared value of the goods. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of substantive material supporting the valuation enhancement and the ambiguity in the nature of the imported goods as revealed in the test report.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2019 09:54:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1358 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380630</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in a case involving the valuation of imported interlining fabric. It dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, ruling that reliance on NIDB data alone was insufficient to enhance the declared value of the goods. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of substantive material supporting the valuation enhancement and the ambiguity in the nature of the imported goods as revealed in the test report.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>