<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1351 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380623</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The respondent was found entitled to a refund of unutilized Cenvat credit as their services were not classified as intermediary services, thus not subject to service tax. The Tribunal emphasized that the respondent&#039;s activities did not meet the criteria for intermediary services as per the CBEC Guidance Note, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal and granting consequential relief to the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1351 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380623</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The respondent was found entitled to a refund of unutilized Cenvat credit as their services were not classified as intermediary services, thus not subject to service tax. The Tribunal emphasized that the respondent&#039;s activities did not meet the criteria for intermediary services as per the CBEC Guidance Note, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal and granting consequential relief to the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>