<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 102 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18262</link>
    <description>Failure to maintain books of account attracts the default under section 44AA, with penalty under section 271A, and the audit obligation under section 44AB arises only where accounts exist and are maintained. Where there is complete non-maintenance of books, the audit-related default is not attracted, so penalty under section 271B cannot be sustained. The levy was therefore held unsustainable in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 10:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 102 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18262</link>
      <description>Failure to maintain books of account attracts the default under section 44AA, with penalty under section 271A, and the audit obligation under section 44AB arises only where accounts exist and are maintained. Where there is complete non-maintenance of books, the audit-related default is not attracted, so penalty under section 271B cannot be sustained. The levy was therefore held unsustainable in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>