<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1343 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380615</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the correct assessable value for excise duty calculation should be based on the price indicated in the delivery challans rather than the lower price declared by a party. It upheld the recovery of the underpaid excise duty and interest but set aside penalties due to a potential misunderstanding of duty liability. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2019 09:53:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1343 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380615</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the correct assessable value for excise duty calculation should be based on the price indicated in the delivery challans rather than the lower price declared by a party. It upheld the recovery of the underpaid excise duty and interest but set aside penalties due to a potential misunderstanding of duty liability. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>