<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1339 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380611</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the denial of CENVAT credit to M/s Sangam Aromatics. It held that the Jammu-based manufacturers did manufacture goods, allowing the appellants to avail credit. Penalties on co-appellants were overturned due to lack of concrete evidence. Allegations of non-existent raw material suppliers and non-manufacture of goods were deemed unsustainable. The investigation by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut-II, lacked validity. Non-compliance with Section 9-D of the Central Excise Act was noted, and the extended limitation period for the show cause notice was found unjustified. Previous Tribunal decisions supported appellants&#039; claims, resulting in relief granted to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2019 13:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1339 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380611</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the denial of CENVAT credit to M/s Sangam Aromatics. It held that the Jammu-based manufacturers did manufacture goods, allowing the appellants to avail credit. Penalties on co-appellants were overturned due to lack of concrete evidence. Allegations of non-existent raw material suppliers and non-manufacture of goods were deemed unsustainable. The investigation by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut-II, lacked validity. Non-compliance with Section 9-D of the Central Excise Act was noted, and the extended limitation period for the show cause notice was found unjustified. Previous Tribunal decisions supported appellants&#039; claims, resulting in relief granted to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>