https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280907 The High Court declared Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, as violative of Article 14 of the Constitution and set aside the impugned order. The court relied on judgments from other High Courts and found the rule to be unreasonable, irrational, and arbitrary. The writ petition challenging the validity of Rule 8(3A) was allowed. en-us Thu, 04 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 May 2019 09:52:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280907 The High Court declared Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, as violative of Article 14 of the Constitution and set aside the impugned order. The court relied on judgments from other High Courts and found the rule to be unreasonable, irrational, and arbitrary. The writ petition challenging the validity of Rule 8(3A) was allowed. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 04 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280907