<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 819 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280897</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to grant exemption u/s 11 to the non-profit research and education organization in Gemology, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The ITAT emphasized that as long as valid registration under section 12A exists, the AO cannot question the organization&#039;s objects, and probing further into its activities was impermissible based on the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in ACIT vs. Surat City Gymkhana.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2019 18:02:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=572583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 819 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280897</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to grant exemption u/s 11 to the non-profit research and education organization in Gemology, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The ITAT emphasized that as long as valid registration under section 12A exists, the AO cannot question the organization&#039;s objects, and probing further into its activities was impermissible based on the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in ACIT vs. Surat City Gymkhana.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>