https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280896 Calcutta HC upheld an Industrial Tribunal's award regarding retrenchment of 52 employees. The Tribunal found the company failed to establish the reorganization scheme was for economy and convenience, with retrenchment occurring only in Calcutta branch despite other branches also losing agencies. The court determined retrenchment was actuated by parochial considerations and not bona fide, though no victimization was proven. HC rejected arguments that Tribunal's findings were perverse or biased, distinguishing between wrong findings and perverse findings. The court upheld Tribunal's reinstatement order, directing suitable transfers to other branches where Calcutta positions unavailable. en-us Wed, 23 Dec 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Jul 2025 18:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280896 Calcutta HC upheld an Industrial Tribunal's award regarding retrenchment of 52 employees. The Tribunal found the company failed to establish the reorganization scheme was for economy and convenience, with retrenchment occurring only in Calcutta branch despite other branches also losing agencies. The court determined retrenchment was actuated by parochial considerations and not bona fide, though no victimization was proven. HC rejected arguments that Tribunal's findings were perverse or biased, distinguishing between wrong findings and perverse findings. The court upheld Tribunal's reinstatement order, directing suitable transfers to other branches where Calcutta positions unavailable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 23 Dec 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280896