https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280893 The Supreme Court found the defendant's appeal against a money decree payable in installments to be maintainable, despite an earlier withdrawn appeal. The Court held that the earlier appeal's incompetence did not affect the right to challenge the decree on merits. The application of certain Civil Procedure Code rules was deemed inapplicable to the appeal, and the defendant's conduct did not disentitle them from filing the present appeal. Consequently, the Court allowed the appeal, set aside the judgment and decree, and remanded the case to the High Court for a decision on merits, with no order as to costs. en-us Thu, 05 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 May 2019 16:02:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280893 The Supreme Court found the defendant's appeal against a money decree payable in installments to be maintainable, despite an earlier withdrawn appeal. The Court held that the earlier appeal's incompetence did not affect the right to challenge the decree on merits. The application of certain Civil Procedure Code rules was deemed inapplicable to the appeal, and the defendant's conduct did not disentitle them from filing the present appeal. Consequently, the Court allowed the appeal, set aside the judgment and decree, and remanded the case to the High Court for a decision on merits, with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280893